Debt & Capital Advisory
An asset no lender could realistically enforce against.
Restructuring an institution against its fee cycle
- The situation
- A private higher-education institution was in default with its lenders. The institution was operating and enrolled, but its debt had been sized against a construction timeline it had not met, with repayments falling due before the fee cycle generated the cash to meet them.
- The complexity
- The asset could not be enforced in any practical sense. A campus with enrolled students has limited alternative use, and the lenders' recovery in an enforcement scenario was materially worse than in a restructuring, but no lender wanted to be first to say so.
- The structure
- The debt was reorganised around the institution's actual fee-collection cycle, with repayments dated to follow admission cycles rather than calendar quarters, secured on campus assets and escrowed fee receipts.
- The outcome
- The institution returned to serviceable debt and continued operating without interruption to enrolment.
Described generically. Client identity, counterparty and transaction terms are confidential.
More case studies
Mandates where the structure, rather than the capital, decided the outcome.
All case studiesA situation of your own
Bring the position, the existing debt schedule and the timeline.
Discuss a mandate